Disclosure of insurer’s identity in public liability claims

Keeping private information private

The Personal Injury Lawyers won another case in the Supreme Court at Brisbane, with the Court handing down the decision that the Solicitor for an insurer of a Respondent party disclose the identity of its client, who was not a party to the proceedings.

It has been a long practice for the identify of insurers of Respondents in personal injury claims to be kept closely guarded.

How can a private identity be identified legally?

However, in the case in question, the identity of the insurer was required.

This was to ensure that all liable parties or any party having any liability to contribute to the injured worker’s claim, was included in the proceedings, prior to expiration of the 3 year limitation date for bringing personal injury claims in Queensland.

In the subject case, the insured respondent had gone into liquidation and had been deregistered as a company.

A firm that had gone in to liquidation

This companies insurer at the time of the worker’s injury occurring, was alleging that its public liability policy did not respond to the worker’s injury claim.

Adding that the company was in no position to enforce its rights under the policy of insurance.

Under the Corporations Act 2001, where a company becomes deregistered, but there is insurance in existence responding to a claim, the insurer can be sued directly as a party to the proceedings that would have been brought against its insured.

The solicitor for the insurer refused to provide any identity information

The solicitor for the insurer however was refusing to provide any information as to the identity of the insurer.

Neither were they regarding the terms of the policy of insurance, thereby disabling the injured worker from pursuing any potential claim against it.

The Personal Injury Lawyers sought the true identity via the supreme court

In a first in Queensland, we brought an Application in the Queensland Supreme Court seeking an Order that the solicitor for the insurer in question provide disclosure of the insurer’s identity and the insurance policy terms.

This was done under section 229 of the Uniform Civil Procedure Rules 1999.

Her Honour Justice A Lyons, upon considering the information presented to her, ordered that the solicitors for the insurer disclose the information sought.

Accordingly, the injured worker’s claim was able to be brought against the insurer of the deregistered Respondent company directly.

 Claims Have Time Limits

✔  There is only a small window in which you can make compensation claims in Queensland

✔  Even if you think your actions may have contributed to your injury, you may still have a claim well-worth pursuing

✔  Just press the button below, there is no cost, and no obligation to review your case

Real 5 star client Google reviews

✔  Read 5 star ★★★★★ real reviews from those we have helped

✔  No fake reviews here, we just work hard for great clients who leave honest feedback.

No win no fee guaranteed

✔  You’ve nothing to lose with our no win no fee guarantee, if we don’t win, you don’t pay our professional fees

✔  Our guarantee quickly pays for all outlays and associated claim expenses.

How much compensation will I get?

✔  Our Compensation Calculator gives a basic indication how much compensation payout you may be due

✔  Simple steps to get a fast overview of all the areas that you may claim for

TPD claim lawyers Brisbane,
Gold Coast & Australia wide

As long established personal injury lawyers, we can help with Queensland motor vehicle accident claims, WorkCover compensation claims and many more claim services. We also offer Australia wide support to help you with your TPD super claim. Try our fast, free TPD compensation payout checker below.